Assaulted, hunted down, and nearly assassinated in Cleveland, Ohio, rapper and entertainer Luckie Mazi is now sharing the harrowing tale of surviving a gunshot wound a year after the incident

The story unfolds as a disturbing sequence of events involving a prosecutor scandal, alleged police neglect, and relentless neighbor stalking, painting a picture that seems more like a bad dream or a chilling horror movie than reality. Yet, Mazi insists, it is all tragically true.As the one-year anniversary approaches since Luckie Mazi and his fiancée experienced a second near-death encounter – this time a shooting allegedly perpetrated by the same individuals who assaulted them at their home on October 2, 2022, an incident that was even documented on channel 19 https://www.cleveland19.com/2022/10/05/west-park-couple-claims-vicious-attack-couldve-been-prevented-if-court-had-granted-restraining-order/ and aired on the Investigation Discovery (ID) Network – a crucial question continues to plague him: How is this possible? How can a couple be assaulted in their own home in 2022 and then, two years later, become victims of gun violence with seemingly no one being held accountable, no indictments issued? This situation, Mazi contends, is unprecedented and demands further investigation.To understand the gravity of the situation, we must delve into the genesis of this nightmare. “Let’s start from the beginning,” Mazi implores. He recounts how his fiancée, Kelly, upon moving into her new home, was initially filled with joy and optimism. However, unbeknownst to her, she had inadvertently moved in between two individuals described as major predators: Steven Rogers and Marco Periandri. Mazi alleges that Steven Rogers has a documented history of violence against women, reaching a disturbing level that includes home invasion, kidnapping, and rape. The passage implies that the proximity of these two individuals to Kelly’s new home set the stage for the subsequent acts of violence and harassment that Mazi and Kelly have endured. The suggestion is that these past actions of Rogers indicate a pattern of behavior that should have raised red flags and potentially prevented the escalation of the situation. The shadow of Marco Periandri hangs heavy over Cleveland, a figure allegedly associated with a disturbing history of multiple counts of women abuse. This history, whispered and perhaps documented, paints a chilling picture of a predator operating within the community. As the years pass, it seems, the landscape for vulnerable individuals becomes more perilous, the schemes of potential abusers growing increasingly sophisticated. Kelly, after thirteen years of independent living and homeownership, she met Luckie Mazi, a successful artist and businessman hailing from Chicago, Illinois. Mazi had built a thriving company before the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019.

As time progressed, Luckie and Kelly, drawn together by love, discussed the possibility of Mark relocating to Cleveland. Little did Kelly know that this decision might place her squarely in the crosshairs of a carefully orchestrated web of alleged manipulation and abuse. Almost immediately upon Mark’s arrival, Steven Rogers and Marco Periandri are accused of collaborating, allegedly devising intricate plans to cultivate a toxic and hostile environment. They purportedly sought to exploit vulnerabilities and exert control through manipulation and intimidation.Adding another layer of complexity, Marco’s sister, Yolanda Cusso, is implicated in the scheme. Cossu allegedly has a history of assisting Marco in evading accountability with law enforcement. Her background as a failed Cleveland police cadet, coupled with alleged ties to the prosecutor’s office, the sheriff’s office, and the Justice Center, raises serious questions about potential conflicts of interest and abuse of power. Moreover, her position as a notary public is alleged to have been exploited to provide false documentation, allowing Rogers and Periandri to co-sign fraudulent documents designed to further their alleged predatory activities. The implication is that Cusso’s professional role has been weaponized, transforming her from a guardian of legal integrity into an alleged facilitator of abuse. 

Luckie Mazi and his fiance are embroiled in a multifaceted battle, fighting against opposition, systemic biases, and what they perceive as predatory behavior. Their struggle stems from a fundamental demand: to be treated with the dignity and respect afforded to all human beings. The core of their conflict seems to center on alleged injustices and a perceived lack of accountability within the legal system.

The passage raises serious questions about the handling of criminal charges. In 2021, during a restraining order hearing, Steven Rogers allegedly had a rape charge expunged from his record. This action prompts immediate inquiry: How is it possible for a rape charge to be expunged, particularly by a clerk’s office? What legal mechanisms allow such a serious offense to be erased from an individual’s record? The writer implies potential corruption or systemic flaws are at play, leading to an uneven application of justice.

This concern is further amplified by a reference to the Marco Periandris case, which allegedly disappeared 20 years prior. The accusation paints a disturbing picture: Periandris is accused of torturing a woman, with his sister, Yolanda, allegedly complicit in the crime. The disappearance of this case raises disturbing questions about obstruction of justice and whether powerful individuals were shielded from prosecution. The author wonders how county and city prosecutors could seemingly ignore this alleged group of criminals for decades, permitting them to commit hate crimes without facing any repercussions. The passage suggests a pattern of impunity and the potential existence of a network of individuals benefiting from the protection of the legal system.

The author stresses that these are not unfounded suspicions, but rather based on demonstrable evidence. “Clear documents” are cited within the article itself, presumably providing corroboration for the couple’s claims and supporting the allegations made against Rogers, Periandris, and potentially others. The author concludes by highlighting the devastating consequences Luckie Mazi and his fiance have suffered as a result of their struggle. They have reportedly lost their home, their dreams, and their jobs, suggesting that their fight for justice has come at a significant personal cost. The passage ultimately serves as a plea for investigation and accountability, demanding answers to the questions raised about potential corruption and the alleged failure of the legal system to protect vulnerable individuals.The city of Cleveland appears to be plagued by systemic corruption, with allegations of criminal behavior reaching even the highest levels of political office. The writer expresses outrage and disbelief at apparent failures within the justice system, citing specific cases that raise serious questions about fairness and impartiality.One incident involves a couple allegedly attacked by a group of six individuals on their front porch. The writer questions how a judge could dismiss the case despite video evidence of the assault. This dismissal, if true, suggests a potential disregard for evidence and victims, fueling suspicions of corruption or bias.Furthermore, the writer highlights the case of Luckie Mazi, who was allegedly followed from his home and shot in the back while retreating in a suburban neighborhood. The existence of video footage documenting the incident further compounds the confusion and anger surrounding the decision not to indict the shooter. The writer poses a critical question: is this a case of racial bias, targeting black entertainers specifically, or is it a consequence of the couple being in an interracial relationship, thereby exposing them to the insidious effects of racism and sexism within the justice system?Regardless of the specific motivations, the writer emphasizes the lack of investigation into the couple’s ordeal. No agency, it seems, has taken action against those who allegedly attacked and harassed them, individuals whom the writer believes are ultimately responsible for the brutal assault and a potential plot to assassinate the couple and force them from their home.