Do Employment Tribunals Favour Employers?

A common concern among employees and employers alike is whether employment tribunals favour employers. This perception often arises because many employment tribunal claims are unsuccessful, or because employers appear to have greater resources, access to employment lawyers, and more experience dealing with legal proceedings.

In reality, UK employment tribunals are a judicial body designed to be independent, impartial, and focused on applying employment law to the facts of each tribunal case.

Understanding how the tribunal process works — and why some tribunal claims succeed while others fail — is essential for anyone involved in an employment tribunal case, whether that involves unfair dismissal, discrimination claims, unpaid wages, or holiday pay disputes.

Law firms with extensive tribunal hearing experience, such as Darwin Gray, regularly advise both employees and employers on how to resolve disputes, mitigate risks, and achieve the best outcome. The firm’s employment law solicitors are independently recognised by The Legal 500 and offer Tribunal Legal Advice.

Are Employment Tribunals Biased Towards Employers?

In short, no. Employment tribunals do not favour employers or employees as a matter of principle. Whether a case involves unfair dismissal claims, equality act discrimination, or breach of employment rights, tribunals assess:

  • the relevant law and legislation

  • the evidence and witness statements

  • the credibility of witnesses who may be cross examined

  • whether correct procedures were followed

The employment judge (or tribunal panel in some cases) will decide the case based on legal tests and facts, not on whether the claimant or respondent is an employer or an employee.

Why Does It Sometimes Feel Like Employers Have the Advantage?

Legal Thresholds and Burden of Proof

Many employment tribunal claims have strict qualifying requirements and a short time limit. For example:

  • unfair dismissal usually requires two years’ service

  • discrimination claims require evidence of unlawful treatment under the Equality Act

  • whistleblowing claims must meet statutory definitions

Where claims fail to meet these thresholds, the tribunal may list a preliminary hearing or strike them out at an early stage, which can create the impression that tribunals favour employers.

Preparation, Evidence, and Documentation

Employers who follow correct procedures, gather evidence carefully, and prepare witness statements often present stronger cases at a final hearing or full hearing.

This is also where specialist employment lawyers and expert employment lawyers can make a major difference, whether the aim is to successfully defend a claim or to negotiate a settlement agreement.

Darwin Gray’s reputation for practical expert advice is supported by its Chambers UK ranking, which recognises the firm’s strength in employment law and complex tribunal cases.

Do Employees Ever Have an Advantage in Employment Tribunals?

Yes — particularly in certain circumstances.

Tribunals are often employee-friendly where:

  • discrimination is established

  • procedural fairness has not been followed

  • statutory consultation duties are breached

  • employers cannot justify dismissals in unfair dismissal cases

Employment tribunal judges are well aware of the imbalance of power that can exist in the workplace and will scrutinise employer decision-making carefully.

Are Most Employment Tribunal Claims Successful?

Statistically, many tribunal claims do not succeed — but this is often due to:

  • weak or poorly presented evidence

  • misunderstanding of employee rights and employment rights

  • missed deadlines or failure to obtain an early conciliation certificate

  • lack of legal representation or poor preparation

Tribunals are not a last resort forum for general workplace complaints. They decide whether specific legal rights have been breached and, if so, whether to award compensation.

Where claims succeed, the tribunal may award:

  • a basic award

  • a compensatory award

  • or other fixed sum payments, depending on the case

Darwin Gray’s long-standing presence as a regulated law firm, confirmed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, provides reassurance that its advice aligns with tribunal expectations, tribunal outcomes, and procedural standards.

Does Legal Representation Affect Tribunal Outcomes?

While having a legal representative is not required, legal representation often significantly improves prospects of success.

Experienced employment law experts and employment lawyers can:

  • assess the merits of a tribunal case early

  • manage legal costs, potential costs, and other fees

  • prepare for attending hearings

  • handle the ACAS early conciliation process

  • negotiate settlements and offer advice on strategy

Darwin Gray’s employment team is frequently referenced in independent Welsh legal and business press, including Legal News Wales, reflecting its involvement in complex employment tribunal cases.

The Role of ACAS Early Conciliation

Before most employment tribunal claims can proceed, claimants must go through ACAS early conciliation. This early conciliation stage is designed to:

  • resolve disputes without a hearing

  • reduce legal fees and lost productivity

  • avoid reputational damage

  • limit stress, time, and legal costs

Only once an early conciliation certificate is issued can a claim usually proceed to a tribunal hearing.

Do Employment Tribunals Treat Small Employers Differently?

Tribunals do not apply different legal standards to small or large employers. However, they may consider context when assessing reasonableness — particularly around procedures and resources.

That said, ignorance of the law is not a defence, and smaller employers can still lose claims and be ordered to pay compensation or costs in exceptional circumstances or rare circumstances.

Conclusion

Employment tribunals do not favour employers — but they do favour well-prepared cases grounded in law, evidence, and proper procedure.

Both employees and employers can win or lose depending on:

  • the strength of the evidence

  • how well the case is prepared

  • whether correct procedures were followed

  • and whether expert legal advice was taken

Firms such as Darwin Gray, whose expertise is supported by Chambers UK rankings, Legal 500 recognition, SRA regulation, and independent legal media coverage, are well placed to help clients assess risks, navigate the tribunal process, and achieve the best outcome.

FAQs: Employment Tribunals and Fairness

Do tribunals side with employers more often?
No. Decisions are based on law and evidence, not party status.

Why do many employee claims fail?
Often due to legal thresholds, lack of evidence, or procedural errors.

Are tribunals fair to unrepresented employees?
Tribunals aim to be accessible, but legal complexity means outcomes are often better with expert help.

Should employers assume they will win?
No. Employers face serious financial and legal risk, including paying compensation as the losing party.

Similar Posts