Former forklift operator Quinton J. Hall alleges racial discrimination and retaliation inside an HD Supply unsafe warehouse at the GA02 Forest Park facility, claiming that after he was injured in a forklift battery incident, the company denied him light-duty work, singled him out for harsher treatment than non-Black coworkers, and ultimately fired him for speaking up about safety and civil-rights violations.

Core Allegations

The complaint, brought by former forklift operator Quinton J. Hall, claims that HD Supply engaged in race discrimination, disability discrimination, a hostile work environment, retaliation, and defamation tied to his employment and termination from the Forest Park, Georgia facility identified as GA02. Hall asserts that he had a solid performance record, including awards and positive feedback, before a June 27, 2024 workplace injury that he says changed the trajectory of his job.

According to the federal complaint, Hall says that after the injury he reported symptoms, requested lighter-duty assignments, and asked for reasonable accommodations tied to back problems and related medical limitations. He contends that instead of working with him on modified duties, managers denied him the kind of light-duty work that other employees allegedly received and began scrutinizing and challenging his conduct and even the legitimacy of his injury

Workplace Incident and Termination

The lawsuit centers on a short timeline in July 2024, when Hall says tensions escalated on the warehouse floor. The complaint describes a July 23 confrontation with a supervisor from a different department and alleges that Hall complained about both treatment and safety concerns soon afterward. Two days later, on July 25, 2024, HD Supply terminated his employment, allegedly citing an “outburst” with the supervisor—a characterization Hall disputes.Hall’s filing says the company’s own human resources representative acknowledged during the termination call that she had not personally witnessed the alleged incident and could not explain what he supposedly did wrong. The complaint presents this as evidence that HD Supply acted on incomplete information and used the confrontation as a pretext to remove a worker who had raised uncomfortable issues about discrimination and safety.

A digital EnerSys battery charger screen inside the alleged HD Supply unsafe warehouse shows a glaring red warning — “BAT TEMP +158°F” — indicating the battery temperature in the danger zone, a visual snapshot Hall cites as evidence that overheating chargers and ignored alarms turned GA02 into a serious safety risk for workers,and safety problems in a Forest Park Georgia distribution center (GA02). 

Discrimination, Retaliation, and Disability claims

The complaint frames the case around multiple federal civil-rights laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, along with several state-law theories. Hall alleges race-based disparate treatment, claiming that comparable coworkers outside his protected class were granted cage-based light-duty assignments while he was kept on heavier, more physically demanding tasks despite a documented back injury. He says he recorded video showing two named coworkers working in the enclosed cage area while he continued to perform strenuous duties on the floor, and he argues this gap in treatment undercut the company’s explanations.In addition to race claims, Hall maintains he is a qualified individual with a disability—or was at least regarded as such—after the June 27 injury, pointing to medical records, a permanent partial disability notice from an orthopedist, and evaluations from a treating psychologist. The lawsuit asserts that HD Supply failed to engage in the interactive process required under the ADA, refused reasonable accommodations, and then retaliated against him for seeking those protections and for opposing disability-based discrimination. Safety, hostile environment, and reputational harm

Safety concerns in the warehouse feature prominently in the narrative. Hall recounts an incident in which he deployed fire extinguishers after a forklift battery overheated and smoked, and he says supervisors acknowledged he did all he could and expressed relief he was not hurt. The complaint also references later video and internal reports by coworkers documenting smoke from forklift battery compartments and high battery temperatures, which Hall casts as corroboration of ongoing hazards he had previously raised.

Hall accuses HD Supply of allowing a hostile work environment to develop after his injury and complaints, including what he describes as a pattern of hostile confrontations, unequal rule enforcement, and remarks implying he was faking his condition. He further alleges that one or more supervisors made false statements about him—such as accusing him of exaggerating or fabricating his injury—to others in the workplace, and he claims those statements damaged his reputation and form the basis of a defamation claim under Georgia law. Evidence, impact, and requested relief

The complaint signals that Hall plans to support his account with a bundle of evidence, including at least twenty coworker affidavits, social-media video and still frames, internal safety reports, and extensive medical and psychological documentation. One coworker, identified in the filing, is said to have heard a supervisor vow that Hall would “get what’s coming,” shortly before his termination, and to have confirmed that he did not see Hall behave aggressively or disrespectfully during the earlier confrontation.Hall reports that he has not found new work since his July 2024 termination despite applying for more than 300 positions, and he attributes his continued unemployment to both the fallout from his firing and his physical and mental-health limitations. The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and asks for sweeping relief, including a declaratory finding of violations, policy changes and training at HD Supply, back pay, front pay, and a substantial monetary award—stated in the complaint as not less than $50 million in combined economic, emotional-distress, and punitive damages, subject to statutory limits and proof at trial.

Inside HD Supply: A National Player Under a Harsh Spotlight

Founded in 1974, HD Supply has grown into one of the nation’s largest industrial distributors, with a business footprint that extends far beyond the single warehouse now drawing federal scrutiny. The official HD Supply company overview presents a diversified enterprise: HD Supply HVAC systems, HD Supply flooring solutions, HD Supply appliances, and an extensive catalog of HD Supply facility maintenance products serving commercial and institutional customers across the country. Its digital engine, HD Supply online shopping, allows contractors, property managers, and government agencies to order materials around the clock, while HD Supply net 30 accounts extend trade-credit terms that let qualified buyers purchase on invoice—standard financial infrastructure in the construction and property-management worlds.

Set against that polished corporate narrative is the federal civil rights complaint filed by former employee Quinton J. Hall, which offers a sharply different view of life inside one of those facilities. Hall’s lawsuit focuses on what he describes as an HD supply unsafe warehouse at the GA02 site in Forest Park, Georgia. In the HD Supply GA02 Forest Park case, he alleges that an HD Supply forklift battery explosion triggered a cascade of events—serious injury, disputed accommodations, and what he characterizes as HD Supply retaliation—forming the backbone of an HD Supply workplace safety lawsuit, an HD Supply ADA and Title VII case, and ultimately an HD Supply $50 million lawsuit now pending in federal court. While HD Supply continues to tout dozens of HD Supply locations nationwide and promote roles through its HD Supply careers portal in logistics, supply-chain management, and sales, Hall’s allegations— how closely do warehouse conditions on the ground align with the safety-conscious image the company projects to customers and investors.

HD Supply Survey

Although Hall’s claims center on a single facility and one worker’s experience, they target a heavyweight in the industrial-supply sector. Since its founding in 1974, HD Supply has evolved into one of the largest industrial distributors in the United States, supplying construction, maintenance, and institutional customers nationwide. Its operations span several core business lines, including:

• HD Supply HVAC products and systems

• HD Supply flooring materials and installation supplies

• HD Supply appliances for multifamily, hospitality, and commercial properties

• HD Supply facility maintenance, inventory, and repair solutions
  

Beyond its physical distribution network, HD Supply operates a robust e-commerce platform widely known as HD Supply online shopping, offering ordering and account-management tools to contractors, government agencies, property managers, and maintenance professionals across the country. The company also promotes HD Supply net 30 accounts—a trade-credit program that allows qualified customers to purchase materials on 30-day invoicing terms, a widely used short-term financing mechanism in the construction and property-management industries. With multiple HD Supply locations across the United States and thousands of employees, the company’s HD Supply careers portal regularly lists openings in warehouse operations, logistics, supply-chain management, sales, and a range of corporate roles—jobs now being weighed against the allegations of an HD supply unsafe warehouse and the pattern of OSHA violations HD Supply alleged at the Forest Park GA02 facility.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/61258268/Hall_v_HD_Supply,_Inc