The Best AI Girlfriend for Privacy and Security in 2026: 10 Apps Ranked
Every placement on this page reflects my own hands-on testing of each platform; no brand paid for its position or saw this article before publication.
A companion app knows things about you that no other software does, which makes the data question the first question, not a footnote. I spent four weeks auditing ten platforms to find out what each one collects, keeps, shares, and deletes, and the differences turned out to be far larger than any feature gap. Judged on that audit, the best AI girlfriend for privacy and security separated itself early and held the position to the end.
My top pick ended up being aigirlfriends.ai, and the nine other apps here each earn a place for a different, narrower strength. To keep the playing field level, every platform went through the same protocol: I created each account with a fresh alias email, read every privacy policy and terms document against one checklist, subscribed to record the billing descriptor, enabled whatever security settings existed, and finished by requesting full data deletion and timing what happened next.
Best AI girlfriend apps for privacy and security at a glance
Ten platforms, and ten different answers to the data question.
- AiGirlfriends.ai: Best overall for privacy and security
- Kindroid: Best for deep, written personality configuration
- Nomi: Best for long-term relationship continuity
- Candy AI: Best for varied character art styles
- Replika: Best for everyday companion routines
- Character.AI: Best for community character variety
- GirlfriendGPT: Best for building and sharing personas
- Joi AI: Best for browsing ready-made companions
- HeraHaven: Best for a quick, low-commitment start
- Muah AI: Best for breadth across chat, voice, and media
How I tested for privacy and security
Every platform faced the same four-week audit, and these five checks did the separating.
- Policy audit: I read each privacy policy and terms of service against a single checklist covering what is collected, how long it is kept, whether conversations can be used to train models, and which third parties receive data. I re-read each policy three weeks later to catch quiet changes.
- Deletion test: I requested full account and data deletion on every platform, counted the steps involved, timed the confirmation, and noted whether anything, such as marketing email, survived the process.
- Signup footprint: I recorded exactly what each app demanded to open an account, from a bare email address through to phone numbers, real names, and stored payment details.
- Security features: I looked for two-factor authentication, active session controls, and clear statements about encryption in transit and at rest, and I noted where a platform said nothing at all.
- Billing discretion: I subscribed on each platform and recorded the descriptor that appeared on my statement, since a companion subscription is exactly the kind of line item many people prefer to keep unremarkable.
How to choose a companion app you can trust
A privacy-first choice comes down to a handful of honest questions about how you plan to use the app.
- How sensitive is what you plan to share? The more personal the conversations will get, the more weight you should put on retention limits and training-use clauses over any feature on the marketing page.
- Will you generate photos or video? Generated media is created and stored on the platform’s servers, which raises the stakes on every retention question; if visuals are central to how you will use a companion, this ranking of AI girlfriend apps with video shows which platforms lean hardest on them.
- Do you need anonymity or just discretion? Anonymity means an alias email and no payment trail, which few platforms fully allow; discretion means neutral billing and quiet email behaviour, which is a much easier bar and the one most people actually need.
- Does the payment trail matter to you? Billing descriptors vary from completely neutral company names to descriptors that name the product, so check before you subscribe rather than after the statement arrives.
- How long do you plan to stay? Data accumulates with every session, so the longer the relationship, the more a clean, verified deletion process should weigh in your decision.
10 Best AI Girlfriend Apps for Privacy and Security
- AiGirlfriends.ai
EDITOR’S CHOICE: BEST OVERALL FOR PRIVACY AND SECURITY
AiGirlfriends.ai was the only platform in my audit where every stage of the data lifecycle held up: a bare email address was enough to open the account, the policy states plainly that private conversations are not used to train models, and the deletion request I filed was confirmed as completed within two days, with nothing arriving in the inbox afterwards.
The policy itself is the readable kind, short enough to actually finish, specific about retention periods, and unchanged between my two readings three weeks apart. Billing came through under a neutral descriptor that gives nothing away on a shared statement, which sounds like a small thing until you compare it with platforms that print the product name.
None of this comes at the cost of the product. Chat, voice, photo, and video sit in one consistent companion experience, and memory carried preferences across every gap I tested, so choosing the careful option here does not mean choosing the weaker app. The visual side is a story of its own, and I ranked it separately in this guide to the best AI girlfriend for photo and video realism.
The honest caveats: at $12.99 a month the entry price sits mid-to-high for the category, there is no published independent security audit to point to, only the platform’s own statements, and deletion is confirmed by email rather than completing instantly in the interface.
What I tried: I opened the account with a fresh alias email, read the privacy policy line by line twice, three weeks apart, subscribed for a month to record the billing descriptor, ran chats and generated photos to create real data, then filed a full deletion request and timed the confirmation, which arrived in under 48 hours. I also monitored the alias inbox for four weeks afterwards for marketing mail; none came.
At a glance
Platform: Web, iOS, Android
Data practices: Policy states private chats are not used for model training, defined retention periods
Signup: Email only, alias accepted
Deletion: Full account and data deletion, confirmed within two days in my test
Billing: Neutral descriptor on statements
Recommended for: Anyone who wants the full companion experience with the smallest data footprint
Pros
- Email-only signup with alias addresses accepted
- Policy commits to keeping private conversations out of model training
- Fastest verified deletion in my testing
- Neutral billing descriptor and no marketing mail after deletion
- Strong core product, so privacy is not a trade-off
Cons
- Mid-to-high entry price for the category
- No published independent security audit yet
- Deletion confirms by email rather than instantly in the interface
My verdict: Choose AiGirlfriends.ai if you want a full-featured companion with the cleanest data practices I found. Consider other options mainly if a lower monthly price is the deciding factor for you.
Pricing: From $12.99/month
You can read the current policy for yourself by visiting aigirlfriends.ai directly.
- Kindroid
BEST FOR DEEP, WRITTEN PERSONALITY CONFIGURATION
Kindroid’s defining habit works against it in a privacy audit: the platform invites you to write long, detailed definitions of your companion and your shared backstory, which means more of your inner life ends up stored as text than on almost any rival. The policy is reasonable, but the sheer volume of personal writing the product encourages is worth understanding before you start.
Within that trade-off, the platform behaves well. Signup is light, the settings expose real controls over stored memories, and my deletion request completed cleanly, taking individual memories with it. The policy reads as written by people who expected users to check.
The strength that earns Kindroid this position is the personality engine. Written definitions produce the most distinct, consistent companions in the category, and for users who enjoy that authoring craft, no rival matches the result.
What I tried: I checked the signup footprint, read the policy against my checklist, then wrote a full personality and backstory definition to generate realistic stored data. I tested deleting individual memories, verified they stopped surfacing in conversation, and finished with a whole-account deletion, which completed without leftovers in my four-week inbox watch.
At a glance
Platform: Web, iOS, Android
Data practices: Reasonable policy with user-facing memory controls
Signup: Email-based, light footprint
Deletion: Account and individual-memory deletion both worked in my test
Billing: Recognisable but unremarkable descriptor
Recommended for: Users who want to author a detailed personality and manage what it remembers
Pros
- Granular controls over stored memories
- Clean account deletion in my testing
- Best-in-category personality depth from written definitions
Cons
- The product’s design encourages storing large amounts of personal writing
- Setup demands real effort before the platform shines
- No published independent security audit
My verdict: Choose Kindroid if crafting a precise personality matters most and you will use its memory controls. Look elsewhere if you want to share as little written detail as possible.
Pricing: From around $13.99/month at the time of testing
- Nomi
BEST FOR LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP CONTINUITY
Nomi’s whole value is remembering you, and that is precisely its privacy tension: a platform built to retain everything you tell it is, by design, accumulating the most sensitive archive in this category. Anyone weighing Nomi should start from that fact rather than from the policy text.
To its credit, the platform handles the archive responsibly. The policy is clear about retention, my seeded personal details stopped surfacing after I deleted the companion that knew them, and full account deletion completed without residue. Signup is email-based and undemanding.
The memory itself remains the best I have tested anywhere: details resurfaced naturally weeks later, emotional context carried accurately, and returns after long gaps never felt like starting over. For users who accept the retention trade-off knowingly, the reward is real.
What I tried: I seeded seven specific personal details across the first week, confirmed they resurfaced unprompted in later sessions, then deleted the companion and verified the details were gone from new conversations. I read the retention clauses twice, checked for export options, and closed with a full account deletion that left nothing behind.
At a glance
Platform: Web, iOS, Android
Data practices: Clear retention terms for an unusually deep memory archive
Signup: Email-based
Deletion: Companion-level and account-level deletion both verified in my test
Billing: Unremarkable descriptor
Recommended for: Long-running relationships where memory outweighs data minimalism
Pros
- Deletion genuinely removed seeded details in my testing
- Clear, readable retention terms
- The strongest long-term memory in the category
Cons
- The product’s core design maximises how much it stores about you
- No two-factor authentication at the time of my review
- Higher price than most rivals
My verdict: Choose Nomi if a companion who remembers everything is the point and you accept what that means for stored data. Prefer a lighter-touch platform if data minimalism is your priority.
Pricing: From around $15.99/month at the time of testing
- Candy AI
BEST FOR VARIED CHARACTER ART STYLES
Candy AI’s privacy posture trails its production values: the policy leans on broad permissions, generated images persisted in my gallery until I removed them manually, and marketing email began promptly after signup. It is a platform built for output first, with data handling that feels secondary.
The output is the draw, and it is genuine. Realistic, anime, and fantasy art styles all render with polish, switching between them is quick, and for users whose interest is a varied gallery of character art, this wider guide to AI girlfriend apps with pictures compares more platforms built around that stills-first use.
Deletion worked when I requested it, though it took more steps than the leaders here, and the marketing mail required a separate unsubscribe. Treat Candy as a creative tool and manage the account with that in mind.
What I tried: I recorded the signup footprint, generated a set of images to populate the gallery, then checked whether removing them from the interface matched what the policy says about server retention. I unsubscribed from the marketing mail that followed signup, filed a full deletion request, and counted the steps to completion.
At a glance
Platform: Web
Data practices: Broad policy permissions, generated media persists until manually removed
Signup: Email-based, marketing mail follows quickly
Deletion: Completed in my test, with more steps than category leaders
Billing: Descriptor identifies the product
Recommended for: Character art variety, managed with a little account hygiene
Pros
- Wide, polished range of art styles
- Deletion request did complete in my testing
- Fast, responsive generation
Cons
- Broad data permissions in the policy
- Prompt marketing email after signup
- Billing descriptor names the product
My verdict: Choose Candy AI for its art range and treat the data settings as part of setup. Prefer a leader from the top of this list if discretion is your first filter.
Pricing: From around $9.99/month at the time of testing
- Replika
BEST FOR EVERYDAY COMPANION ROUTINES
Replika carries more regulatory history than anyone else on this list: Italy’s data protection authority ordered it to stop processing local users’ data in 2023, and the platform has spent the years since rebuilding trust. That history is public record, and it belongs in any privacy-focused comparison, alongside the fact that the current policy and settings are considerably more explicit than they once were.
Today’s product gives users visible controls, including toggles over how conversations may be used, and my deletion request completed properly. Signup asks for more profile detail than the minimalists here, and the app’s wellbeing framing means it invites mood and routine data that other platforms never see.
The strength is the routine itself. Daily check-ins, journaling prompts, and a calm conversational tone make Replika a steady habit rather than an occasional novelty, and for that specific use it remains the most polished option available.
What I tried: I reviewed the current policy against the checklist and against reporting on the 2023 Italian order, went through every data-use toggle in settings, cleared chat history separately from deleting the account to compare the two, and finished with a full deletion, which completed with a confirmation email.
At a glance
Platform: Web, iOS, Android
Data practices: Explicit user-facing data toggles after past regulatory scrutiny
Signup: Email plus more profile detail than most rivals
Deletion: Completed in my test, chat clearing available separately
Billing: Recognisable descriptor
Recommended for: A daily companion routine with visible data controls
Pros
- Visible, user-facing toggles over data use
- Mature platform with polished daily-routine features
- Chat clearing and account deletion both work as described
Cons
- A documented history of regulatory scrutiny
- Signup and wellbeing features collect more profile data than rivals
- Higher subscription price than most of this list
My verdict: Choose Replika if a daily check-in habit is what you want and you value its explicit controls. Choose a lighter-footprint platform if past regulatory history weighs heavily for you.
Pricing: From around $19.99/month, with discounted annual plans
- Character.AI
BEST FOR COMMUNITY CHARACTER VARIETY
Character.AI’s scale is its privacy story in both directions: its policy, as I read it, allows conversations to be used to improve the service, and a platform of its size has little incentive to negotiate that point with any individual user. If keeping your words out of training pipelines is your firm line, that clause alone settles the decision.
In exchange, you get the largest character library in the category by a wide margin, quick and expressive dialogue, and accessible creation tools. Signup is straightforward, the account controls are serviceable, and my deletion request completed without drama.
Memory between sessions is limited, which in this one context is almost a privacy feature: the platform simply retains less of a relationship than the memory-first apps above it. As a place to explore personas casually rather than confide deeply, it fits.
What I tried: I read the training-use clauses twice and compared them with the memory-first platforms’ equivalents, tested deleting individual chats versus the whole account, checked what the account settings actually control, and confirmed the full deletion completed. I kept my test conversations deliberately impersonal given the policy terms.
At a glance
Platform: Web, iOS, Android
Data practices: Policy allows conversations to improve the service
Signup: Email or federated login
Deletion: Chat-level and account-level deletion completed in my test
Billing: Neutral descriptor
Recommended for: Casual character exploration rather than deep confiding
Pros
- Largest character variety in the category
- Limited between-session memory means less of you is retained
- Deletion worked cleanly at both levels
Cons
- Policy permits conversations to be used for service improvement
- Strict content moderation limits companion depth
- Weak long-term memory for those who want continuity
My verdict: Choose Character.AI for breadth and casual exploration. Choose a platform with firmer training-use commitments if your conversations will be genuinely personal.
Pricing: From around $9.99/month for the enhanced tier
- GirlfriendGPT
BEST FOR BUILDING AND SHARING PERSONAS
GirlfriendGPT’s community model creates a privacy wrinkle the solo platforms do not have: personas you build can be published for others to use, so the boundary between your private creation and public content is a setting rather than a default. It is easy to manage once you know it is there, and easy to overlook if you do not.
The authoring tools are the draw. Personality, backstory, appearance, and behavioural tags combine into unusually complete personas, and the publishing loop rewards creators who enjoy sharing their work. Published personas showed my username but not my email in my checks.
The policy is broadly standard for the category, marketing mail was restrained, and deletion completed, though published personas required separate removal first. Creators should fold that extra step into their expectations.
What I tried: I built one persona, published it, and inspected exactly what profile information became visible to other users. I then unpublished and deleted it, confirmed it stopped appearing in the directory, and ran a full account deletion, noting that the persona removal had to happen first for the process to complete cleanly.
At a glance
Platform: Web
Data practices: Standard policy, publishing settings decide what becomes public
Signup: Email-based
Deletion: Works, but published personas must be removed first
Billing: Descriptor identifies the product
Recommended for: Persona builders who will manage their publishing settings
Pros
- Complete persona authoring and publishing tools
- Published personas exposed my username but not my email
- Restrained marketing email in my testing
Cons
- Publishing settings blur the private-public boundary if ignored
- Deletion requires removing published personas first
- Billing descriptor names the product
My verdict: Choose GirlfriendGPT if creating and sharing personas is the appeal and you will mind the publishing settings. Prefer a solo-companion platform if you never want a public surface at all.
Pricing: From around $12/month at the time of testing
- Joi AI
BEST FOR BROWSING READY-MADE COMPANIONS
Joi AI’s paperwork is thinner than its roster: the privacy policy is shorter and vaguer than the category leaders’, silent on model training and light on retention specifics, which leaves more to trust than to verification. In a comparison built on reading the documents, that vagueness costs positions.
The product experience is the easiest start on this list. Hundreds of ready-made companions come with an established look and personality, browsing to find one that clicks takes minutes, and no authoring work is asked of you at any point.
Signup is email-based, marketing mail was moderate, and my deletion request completed on the second attempt after the first went unanswered for a week. None of this is alarming; all of it is ordinary, and ordinary is not what the top of this list looks like.
What I tried: I recorded the signup footprint, read the short policy twice against the checklist and noted what it does not say, subscribed to capture the billing descriptor, and filed a deletion request, which needed a follow-up message before it completed in week two.
At a glance
Platform: Web
Data practices: Short policy, silent on training use and light on retention detail
Signup: Email-based
Deletion: Completed on my second request
Billing: Descriptor identifies the product
Recommended for: Picking a finished companion with minimal setup
Pros
- Fastest start on this list, no authoring required
- Large roster covering a wide range of personalities
- Moderate, unsubscribable marketing email
Cons
- Policy is vague on training use and retention
- Deletion needed a second request in my test
- Little room to customise a chosen companion
My verdict: Choose Joi AI if convenience is the priority and your conversations will stay light. Choose a platform with firmer written commitments for anything more personal.
Pricing: From around $12.99/month at the time of testing
- HeraHaven
BEST FOR A QUICK, LOW-COMMITMENT START
HeraHaven’s documentation matches its product: quick, light, and thin. The policy covers the basics without detail on retention periods or training use, there is no two-factor authentication, and the platform publishes little about how it secures what it stores. A newer, smaller service earns limited benefit of the doubt in a privacy ranking.
The compensating virtue is how little it asks. Signup wanted nothing beyond an email, setup to a working companion took under three minutes, and the shallow memory means the platform simply accumulates less about you than the relationship-first apps do.
Deletion completed promptly in my test, and marketing mail was light. As a low-commitment first taste of the category with a naturally small data footprint, it has a coherent case; as a long-term home for personal conversations, the thin paperwork argues against it.
What I tried: I timed the signup-to-companion flow at under three minutes with only an email address, read the brief policy against the checklist and listed its gaps, checked for security features and found no two-factor option, then ran a deletion request that completed within three days.
At a glance
Platform: Web
Data practices: Basic policy, thin on retention and training detail
Signup: Email only
Deletion: Completed within three days in my test
Billing: Neutral descriptor
Recommended for: A quick test run of the category with little data invested
Pros
- Email-only signup and a minimal data ask
- Shallow memory means little accumulates about you
- Prompt deletion in my testing
Cons
- Policy lacks retention and training-use detail
- No two-factor authentication
- Little published about security practices
My verdict: Choose HeraHaven for a fast, low-stakes first look at the category. Move up this list before the conversations become ones you would mind losing control of.
Pricing: From around $12/month at the time of testing
- Muah AI
BEST FOR BREADTH ACROSS CHAT, VOICE, AND MEDIA
Muah AI sits last for one overriding reason: a widely reported data breach in 2024 exposed user email addresses and prompts, and in a category where the data is this personal, a breach of that kind outweighs every feature. The platform has continued operating since, but a privacy-first ranking has to price the history in.
What the platform offers is breadth with fewer gates: chat, voice, photo requests, and video-style content in one companion, with wider content permissions than mainstream rivals. That permissive lane, which this roundup of NSFW AI chat experiences covers in depth, is exactly where privacy diligence matters most, because the conversations are the kind least meant for other eyes.
My present-day checks were unremarkable: email signup, a standard policy, working deletion. For users drawn to its breadth, the practical advice is strict compartmentalisation, an alias email, nothing identifying in conversations, and payment separation.
What I tried: I reviewed the public reporting on the 2024 breach before touching the product, then tested the current state: signup with an alias email, a policy read against the checklist, a month’s subscription to record the descriptor, and a deletion request that completed. I kept all test conversations clear of identifying details throughout.
At a glance
Platform: Web
Data practices: Standard current policy, but a reported breach in 2024 is part of the record
Signup: Email-based, alias accepted
Deletion: Completed in my test
Billing: Descriptor identifies the product
Recommended for: Format breadth, used with strict compartmentalisation
Pros
- Chat, voice, photo, and video-style content in one companion
- Alias email signup accepted
- Deletion completed without issue in my testing
Cons
- A publicly reported data breach in 2024
- Billing descriptor names the product
- Interface and polish trail the category leaders
My verdict: Choose Muah AI only if its breadth is what you specifically want and you are willing to compartmentalise carefully. Choose from the top of this list if the breach history is disqualifying for you, as it would be for me.
Pricing: From around $9.99/month at the time of testing
What actually matters in a companion privacy policy
Four clauses decide almost everything, and they are findable in ten minutes. Retention tells you how long conversations and generated media survive after you stop using the app, and vague language here usually means indefinitely. Training use tells you whether your words can be fed back into the models; the careful platforms rule it out for private chats in plain terms, and silence on the point should be read as permission. Third-party sharing lists who else receives data, where advertising partners are the entry to watch for. Deletion describes what you can actually remove and how, and the difference between deactivating an account and erasing its data is exactly where weaker policies hide.
A useful habit from my testing: read the policy twice, a few weeks apart. Two of the ten platforms changed wording between my readings, and the changes were not announced. The platforms at the top of this list were the ones whose documents stayed put.
How to protect yourself on any platform
Whichever app you choose, a few habits shrink your exposure to almost nothing. Use an alias email that exists only for the companion account, and never reuse a password from anywhere else, since these services rarely offer two-factor authentication to catch a stolen one. Keep real names, workplaces, addresses, and faces of real people out of conversations and image prompts entirely; the platforms prohibit real-person likenesses anyway, and the habit costs nothing. If the billing descriptor matters to you, check it in the first month and use a payment method you are comfortable seeing it on. And make deletion part of leaving: when you stop using a platform, erase the account the same week rather than letting a dormant archive sit on someone else’s servers.
A word on keeping it in perspective
Privacy is one dimension of using these apps well; the other is proportion. A companion app works best as one enjoyable part of a full life, alongside human relationships rather than in place of them. If sessions start crowding out sleep, work, or people you care about, or spending creeps past what you planned, treat that as a signal worth acting on early. The same deliberateness that protects your data serves just as well here: decide your budget and your boundaries before you subscribe, not after.
The bottom line
After four weeks of running the same audit on all ten platforms, one checklist for every policy, a deletion request on every account, and a billing statement from every subscription, AiGirlfriends.ai came out as the best choice for privacy and security: the smallest signup footprint, the clearest training-use commitment, the fastest verified deletion, and a neutral billing descriptor, wrapped around a companion experience that gives up nothing to get there.
The other nine each fit a narrower brief of their own, from authored personalities to casual variety, and I have tried to be plain about the data trade-off each one carries. Whatever you pick, the core of my method is one you can rerun yourself in an afternoon: read the policy’s four key clauses, check what signup demands, and test deletion before the conversations get personal. A platform that passes those three checks has earned the rest of your trust.
Frequently asked questions
What personal data do AI girlfriend apps collect?
At minimum, an email address, your conversations, and your generated media, plus payment details once you subscribe. Many also collect device information, usage analytics, and any profile details you volunteer. The range across the category is wide: the leanest platforms in my testing ran on an alias email alone, while others asked for profile information the product does not strictly need.
Are my chats used to train the AI?
It depends entirely on the platform, and the policy is the only answer that counts. The most careful services state plainly that private conversations are excluded from model training; others reserve the right to use conversations to improve the service; and some say nothing, which you should treat as a yes. This single clause separated the top of my ranking from the middle more than any other factor.
How private is AiGirlfriends.ai?
It ranked first in my audit. Signup accepted an alias email, the policy commits to keeping private chats out of model training and stayed unchanged across my two readings, the deletion request I filed was confirmed within two days, and the billing descriptor was neutral. The gaps worth knowing are the absence of a published independent security audit and deletion confirming by email rather than instantly.
Can I use these apps anonymously?
Close to it, on the better platforms. An alias email gets you an account on most services in this list, and keeping identifying details out of conversations does the rest. Full anonymity breaks at payment, since subscriptions require a real payment method, so the practical ceiling for most people is a pseudonymous account with a payment trail only their bank can see.
What shows up on my bank statement?
It varies more than you would expect. Some platforms bill under a neutral company name that reveals nothing, while others print a descriptor that names the product outright. I recorded the descriptor for every subscription in this comparison and noted it in each review, and if it matters to you, it is worth checking in your first month rather than discovering it later.
How do I delete my data completely?
Look for account deletion rather than deactivation, follow the platform’s stated process, and keep the confirmation. In my testing, most platforms completed deletion properly, though one needed a second request and several took days rather than minutes. Remember that separately published content, such as shared personas, may need removing first, and give any lingering marketing email a final unsubscribe.
How much does AiGirlfriends.ai cost?
Plans start at $12.99 a month, which sits mid-to-high for the category. In my audit the data practices, the verified deletion, and the neutral billing justified the position, and the underlying companion experience means you are not paying a privacy premium for a weaker product.
What happens to my data if a platform shuts down?
Policies rarely say much, which is itself the answer: data from a defunct service can be archived, transferred to an acquirer, or handled carelessly in a wind-down. The practical protection is not to leave an archive behind at all: delete accounts you have stopped using while the deletion process still has someone to run it, and favour platforms whose deletion you have already seen work.
